Blog Tools
Edit your Blog
Build a Blog
RSS Feed
View Profile
« October 2008 »
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31
You are not logged in. Log in
Entries by Topic
All topics  «
Author Interview
Blog Tours
Book Review
Book Trailers
Character Interviews
First Chapter
Writing Ramblings
Books and Authors
Monday, 27 October 2008
More Excerpts from The Sage Age by MaAnna Stephenson
Topic: Blog Tours

The Rational and the Intuitive

In our daily lives, each of us incorporates our rational “knowings” and our intuitive “knowings” into a wholistic matrix that helps us make sense of our world. It’s likely that each of us leans a little more toward one way or the other type of knowing depending on personal preference.

The phrases “rational scientist” and “intuitive practitioner” are used extensively throughout The Sage Age. These are not mutually exclusive types of people. Rather, they represent schools of thought in perception and focus. For example, “rational scientist” refers to those who primarily make use of the intellect in the methodical investigation of reality. The term “intuitive practitioner” refers to those who primarily use a supersensible means of perception in a wholistic investigation of reality. In other words, they use senses other than the five associated with the tangible world. The term “intuitive” is a little different than the word “spirituality” in an important way. The intuitive arts are concerned with the esoteric sciences meaning that they deal primarily with the investigation of metaphysics in a methodical manner. Spirituality, on the other hand, is personal and subjective and focuses on how each person relates to everything in accordance with their beliefs.

At this point in history we have the opportunity to combine all ways of knowing to understand informed energy in an entirely new way thereby resolving many of the dilemmas we face today. The Sage Age highlights the information that each way of knowing brings and blends them into new models for new thought.

How do you combine your rational and intuitive knowings to form a wholistic view?

Einstein and His Famous Equation

When most people hear the name Einstein, the next thought is usually his famous equation, E=mc2. Believe it or not, Einstein’s Nobel Prize was not awarded for this revolutionary discovery, but for his lesser known paper on the Photo-Electric Effect also published in the same year. A good deal of the confusion about Relativity Theory is that most folks think it is one theory. It is actually three different ideas submitted in three different papers. The equation showing the relationship of energy to mass can be found in an addendum he submitted three months after publishing the Special Theory of Relativity in 1905. He began work on the General Theory of Relativity in 1907 and finished it in 1915. With it, he added the effects of gravity to his original equations and revolutionized how we view the makeup of the universe. And then there’s the confusion about that light speed squared business. What’s that all about?

Einstein’s first paper was titled “On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies.” This eventually became known as the Theory of Special Relativity. It dealt primarily with how space and time were related, showing that they were actually two descriptions of the same phenomenon known as 4D spacetime. (A description of spacetime and how it differs from 3D space with an added element of time can be found in my article titled “Dimensions.”) It also explained the time dilation between objects which were moving near the speed of light and those that were moving very slow compared to the speed of light.

The paper showed time to be relative to its frame of reference. For example, if you and a buddy are standing in the aisle of a moving jet and tossing a ball back and forth, the two of you seem to be still and the ball seems to be moving at a normal, slow rate of speed. But, to an observer on the ground the ball, you, your friend, and the jet are all moving at 200 mph. The plane provides you with a different frame of reference than the one the observer on the ground has. Both Galileo and Newton understood this concept and called it an “inertial frame.” Einstein enlarged the inertial frame by stating that everything including you, the jet and the observer on the ground were all moving at speeds far below that of light. When one of the objects in the scenario gets ramped up to light speed, everything changes.

Because of this, no one observer had a privileged frame of reference. In other words, if an event happened and was observed in two different spatial locations, the event might appear to have happened simultaneously to one observer and as two separate events to another observer. The different perspectives were due to each observer’s motion in relation to the event. Therefore, both observations would be correct to each observer respectively. It would be impossible for either observer to claim they saw the event the “right” way.

Just as Einstein’s first paper showed that space and time were two descriptions of one phenomenon, similarly, the addendum to this paper showed that energy and mass were also two descriptions of one phenomenon. Energy and mass are not equal, as is often misquoted. They are intra-convertible. A very small amount of mass can be exchanged for a very large amount of energy, as demonstrated by experiments in atomic and nuclear physics. It’s considered one of the most elegant formulas in all of physics because a few characters demonstrate the complex concepts found in the original equation which is big enough to fill a blackboard.

Einstein applied this equation to whether or not an object of mass, any mass, could be accelerated to the speed of light. That’s also were the c2 part of the equation comes into play. The whole thing is about speed, not light. Let’s roll a rock to see how that works. It’s a rather large rock, so it takes a good deal of energy to get it rolling. The energy from that initial push is now stored in the rock as kinetic energy, which it dissipates as it rolls. Any additional pushes just store more kinetic energy than the can dissipate and now it has velocity. So, when we want to stop the rock from rolling, we have to absorb the extra energy it contains. The kinetic energy is proportional to the speed squared. So, if you give the rock twice the energy it can disperse, it will take four times as much energy to stop it from rolling (twice the energy squared is four times the energy). In Einstein’s equation, c represents the speed of light, emphasis placed on the word “speed.” His famous equation then, is the ratio of the energy required to move a mass proportional to the speed of light squared.

Some content excerpted from The Sage Age – Blending Science with Intuitive Wisdom
© 2008 MaAnna Stephenson
Content may be used freely with proper credit and a link to

To learn more about MaAnna Stephenson and The Sage Age, visit and you can subscribe to The Sage Age Newsletter while you are there.

For more tour information, visit

You can order your own copy of The Sage Age at

Posted by joyceanthony at 12:46 AM EDT
Post Comment | View Comments (3) | Permalink

Monday, 27 October 2008 - 7:51 AM EDT

Name: "Ron Berry"
Home Page: http://htttp://

You've explained the principle of energy squared in very good terms. It also puts kinetic energy into better focus. This confused me in high school physics, kinetic versus potential. I've read the special theory and found it fascinating. As I recall, Einstein and Bohr were at odds about applying quantum mechanics to the theory of relativity. It took both together to come close to a unified theory, later worked on by Hawking.

I believe, to sum up Einsteins theories in simplistic terms he is saying that actions of one to another are relative to the observers of said action. I think that's correct but at this hour of the morning could be totally off base.

Monday, 27 October 2008 - 10:16 AM EDT

Name: "MaAnna Stephenson"
Home Page:

Hi Ron, you summed it up very nicely. And oh my, yes, Einstein and Bohr where at opposite ends of the pole over quantum theory application. Their very public debates are still legendary in the physics communities. Even though Einstein finally disengaged, until his death, he maintained that quantum theory was incomplete because it required hidden variables to make the equations work. And he never got comfortable with the whole "spooky action at a distance" stuff that was brought to light by the idea of entanglement.

And yes, one of Hawking's stellar (forgive the pun) achievments was being the first person to successfully combine the mathematics of quantum physics with relativity leading to his prediction of sub-atomic radiation from black holes, which were later verified. It's called Hawking Radiation, in his honor. Because of his breakthrough, those two communities are finally communicating with one another and a Grand Unified Theory may now be within reach, well, as soon as they figure out the gravity issue. Now that the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) is online, perhaps we will have those experimental answers soon.

And, again, yes, Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity states that the order of events witnessed by one observer has everything to do with their timeframe and position with relation to the timeframe and position of what's being observed. Galileo and Newton also helped define this notion, it's just that they always used timeframes that involved things moving on the Earth. Einstein simply ramped things up to lightspeed over great distances and was able to show that Galileo's ideas were a subset of a much larger idea. Things are different when one of the participants is moving really, really fast compared to the other participants.

One of the other ideas Einstein brought forward in that theory, and is often overlooked, is that no observer can claim a priviledged vantage point. In other words, how each participant sees events play out is correct for them, from their position. The philosophical implications of this are astounding. No one, from any vantage point, can say that things happen only "this way" and no other way. The absolute order of cause and effect completely breaks down. Many intuitive arts practitioners work at the level where time is of no concern and the effect of past events is as easily dealt with as are present events. If you are interested in this topic, The Sage Age covers both ideas in-depth and presents models of how this works using a torus, which is a multi-dimensional, donut shaped object. In fact, it is one of the models currently being investigated at the LHC. I believe it will open many doors so we can move from the age of information to a vibrational age of understanding energy in an entirely different way

Monday, 27 October 2008 - 7:22 PM EDT

Name: "MaAnna Stephenson"
Home Page:


Thank you so much for hosting The Sage Age on your blog over four days. It has certainly been a pleasure to cyber meet you and interact with your readers.


View Latest Entries